Here’s an interesting OSPF-related question I got::

“Which one is better: default-information originate or default-information originate always?”

As always, the answer is it depends. If your OSPF edge routers have external default routes (for example, static default routes toward the Internet, see the next diagram), you'd want them to announce the default route only when they have a default themselves (otherwise, they would attract the traffic and then blackhole it). In this case, you’d use default-information originate.

Another Cisco IOS OSPF implementation trivia: if you’re redistributing a default route into OSPF (for example, you have a static default route configured with ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 … and you use redistribute static subnets within the OSPF process), the default route will not be entered into the OSPF database unless you configure default-information originate within the router ospf configuration.

Similarly, if you configure default-information originate always, the router will inject the type 5 LSA for the default route into the OSPF topology database even if the router itself does not have a default route (or gateway of last resort).

Similar to the show processes cpu sorted command, the show processes memory sorted printout displays the top memory consumers (see example below).

Recently I was investigating MTU-related problems and got mightily upset when I had to search for the interface IP MTU size in the long printout produced by the show ip interface command. Obviously I could display the IP MTU size of a single interface with the show ip interface name | include MTU filter, but I wanted to have a nice tabular printout. Obviously it was time for another Tcl script.

To use it, download it and store it into the flash memory of your router. Configure alias exec ipconfig tclsh flash:ipInterfaces.tcl and you can use ipconfig or ipconfig active to display interface IP addresses.

One of the hardest troubleshooting problems within an MPLS VPN network has always been finding a broken LSP. While you could (in theory) use the IP ping or traceroute (assuming all hops support ICMP extensions for MPLS), the results are not always reliable… and interpreting them is not so easy. For example, after I've disabled LDP on an interface with the no mpls ip configuration command, the routers in the LSP path still reported outgoing MPLS labels in ICMP replies for a few seconds (until the LDP holddown timer expired on both ends of the link).

As a side note, would you deduce from the printout that the break in the LSP path happened on the router with the IP address 192.168.201.1?

Due to the way Cisco routers behave when dropping packets with an inbound access list, whenever you use access lists to protect the router from the outside attacks (or port scans), the protected ports (even though they're not active on the router) will appear filtered (some scanners might use the term stealth), which is almost an invitation to a determined hacker.

Sometimes (it depends on the application you're protecting) you can configure application-layer protection in Cisco IOS. For example, you can protect HTTP server with ip http access-class global configuration command or the Telnet server with the access-class in line configuration command (and BGP will not accept incoming TCP SYN packets unless you've configured a BGP neighbor). The access-class configuration causes the incoming request to be rejected within application (in control plane after the TCP stack), resulting in TCP RST packet being sent back. The port scanner thus reports the protected TCP port as closed.

Under some circumstances, you might want to tune the ARP timers on the router (for example, when using ARP as a keepalive mechanism to detect whether the host is up). Unfortunately, although you can set the per-interface arp timeout in seconds, the actual timer resolution is in minutes. For example, if you set the ARP timeout to 10 seconds, the router will age the ARP entries once per minute.

When I was testing the inspection of router-generated traffic, I wanted to block and log all incoming traffic (apart from inspect-generated conduits, obviously) with a simple access-list:

access-list 102 deny ip any any log

Unfortunately, the port numbers in the logging printout were always zero:

%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 102 denied udp 10.0.0.1(0) -> 192.168.1.3(0), 1 packet

The reason for this behavior is very simple: unless a line in the IP ACL matches on the layer-4 port numbers, the router does not inspect them; the log action thus has no port number to show in the syslog printout.

In a previous post I've been writing about the inability to clean the ARP cache due to cached CEF adjacencies. As it turns out, this behavior has another side effect: the router will automatically refresh all ARP entries (and CEF adjacencies) as they expire from the ARP cache. This might become a problem on high-end devices with a lot of directly connected hosts if you set the arp timeout to a low value.

Recently I was trying to figure out what the various port states reported by Nmap really mean. This is what's actually going on:

• If a packet is intercepted by a router's access-list, the router sends back an ICMP administratively prohibited packet. This is reported as filtered port by Nmap (and probably as stealth port by some other scanners).
• If you do a TCP SYN scan of a router and the scanned port is not active, the router sends back TCP RST packet. This is reported as closed port.
• If you perform a UDP scan of a router, the router sends back ICMP port unreachable message if the UDP application is not active. This is reported by Nmap as filtered port (even though in most cases it should be equivalent to closed TCP port).
• In some cases, the router simply doesn't reply to UDP scans (for example, if you scan the discard service). This is reported as Open¦Filtered (as the scanner cannot reliably determine whether the probe was dropped due to a filter or simply not replied to).

Note: In any case, UDP scans are way more unreliable than TCP scans due to connectionless nature of UDP.